It is unusual to dismiss a fire chief who couldn’t do his job because the equipment he was given was deficient. To discharge two chiefs within three years for the same reason is exceptional. In hind-sight it can be seen for what it was: Auckland City Council was derelict in its care of, and support for, the city’s fire protection over many years in the late 1800s. And then the Council, twice, ignored all the evidence pointing directly at itself, finding instead a convenient scapegoat: the Fire Chief.
Herbert Frederick Gladding joined the Auckland Fire Brigade in 1884 aged 29, rose through the ranks to Foreman at Grafton Station when, in July 1899 he was appointed officer-in-charge, Superintendent.
Gladding must have known it was going to be an up-hill battle to improve the brigade because, as he had seen for long time, the City Council had let fire protection slide with practically no spending. It was going to take a lot of courage, and money, to invest the large sum required to provide a modern fire brigade.
His predecessor Jim Hughes led firefighting at the 1898 blaze in the multi-storey Direct Supply Company (DSC) building on the corner of Queen Street and Victoria Street East. Fire-spread was rapid and firefighters were taxed to get the better of the fire before it spread to adjacent buildings.
Operations were disrupted by unhelpful “assistance” from firefighters who were in Auckland for a Fire Brigades’ Conference and, of course, who had been attracted to the major fire. Their “help” bordered interference, delaying operations. But all the visitors who were watching the scenario unfold were astonished by the primitive firefighting equipment deployed: most of the spectators came from much smaller towns than Auckland and observed they had better apparatus at home.
An inquest into the DSC fire found the fire brigade was ill-equipped. Counsel for the insurance companies, Charles James Parr, said “I think the jury will agree with me that there has been little less than criminal neglect on the part of the authorities”. The jury did agree… but despite this finding the Council overlooked its own shortcomings and blamed Superintendent Jim Hughes. Despite testimonials, references, public meetings and petitions supporting Jim Hughes, the Council terminated his employment; thinly disguising their action by saying it was part of essential retrenchment.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #1 July 4 1899
Gladding took charge of a difficult fire within days of taking office. Two boarding houses in Vincent Street were alight at one o’clock in the morning, surrounded by blocks of older wooden buildings. Gladding was praised for restricting the flames to, mainly, one of the boarding houses and stopping fire-spread to adjacent wooden premises 1.
It was said luck was on the side of the firefighters in Vincent Street that night: an early alarm of fire, no distance for the brigade to travel, little wind and good water pressure. But each fire brought with it a reminder that Auckland’s fire protection as seriously wanting. The City Council was solely responsible for administering the fire brigade and so it relied on Council for funding and support. A glance around the aging fire station and the primitive equipment gave many pointers that the City Council had over many years ignored numerous reports and requests from Jim Hughes, along with much criticism of the brigades shortcomings. It went without: Councillors diverted their attention, and funds, to other civic amenities.
Then, as now, Auckland was the fastest-growing city in New Zealand with an estimated population of 60,000.2 Yet other centres had enjoyed far superior fire protection for many years. Cities and towns, some at that time quite small, had imported fire pumps which were mobilised to a fire either by man-power or with horses and, once in position and with hoses connected, relied on man-power to make the pump work. For instance: Gisborne imported equipment in 1878, Rangiora in 1883, Greytown in 1888, Palmerston North in 1888, Feilding in 1891, Petone in 1892, and Westport in 1893.3
Some brigades ordered steam pumps towards the turn of the century, the first of which went into service about the time Gladding was appointed Chief. Other centres, like Wanganui, were looking at motorised appliances and these arrived in New Zealand in the first few years of the 1900s.
Auckland Fire Brigade, serving the biggest city in New Zealand, had no such pumping equipment, nor any on order. In 1900 it didn’t have one pump – firefighters had to rely on the pressure in the water mains to obtain sufficient jets to, for example, reach the flames on upper floors.
So in this respect it did not measure up to one of six basics required for an efficient fire brigade, as spelled out by veteran New Zealand fire chief Thomas Hugo, who became the Inspector of Fire Brigades in the colony. He said there must be:
- Adequate plant and resources after arriving at a fire.
His other vital requirements were:
- A reliable, easily accessible, fire alarm system so fires can be promptly reported
- A custom-designed station so men can easily turnout within 20 seconds of the call being received
- Dedicated firefighters available on station 24X7
- Suitable horses kept on station exclusively for the brigade, and,
- Sufficient supply and pressure of water at the scene. 4
Auckland Fire Brigade could not score on any one of Hugo’s 6 essential points. Herbert Gladding knew the brigade was deficient before he took office. He well knew unsuccessful efforts by his predecessor, Jim Hughes, to make basic improvements to the brigade with two exceptions… Council approved the purchase of a system of electric street fire alarm boxes introduced in 1883. But these had soon been abandoned, described as “…a useless toy” by a correspondent to Letters to the Editor.5 Then there was a new extension Merryweather ladder, delivered in 1884, but which did not meet Superintendent Hughes’ specifications and arrived in Auckland having been damaged in transit. Hughes said the ladder was “limp”. Inquiries showed the ladder had been stowed for the long voyage from England in the ship’s hold near the boilers. The timbers of the ladder had been affected by heat and steam which left the wooden ladder sections “as crooked as a dog’s hind leg” according to one newspaper report. On top of which Hughes found it difficult to manoeuvre the appliance in narrow downtown streets and to elevate the ladder because of overhead telephone lines. One report suggests a firefighter on the ladder received a shock when he inadvertently came in contact with a telephone wire.
This state of fire brigade affairs became apparent during a ceremony to mark Herbert Gladding’s appointment as the new Superintendent, held at the fire station in July 1899.6
Gladding thanked everyone for their welcome to his new office and then boldly stated, “I hope the City Council will do its duty by the brigade, and give the plant and appliances which would bring it up to the standard of efficiency of the Southern fire brigades. I know how ex-Superintendent Hughes had endeavoured to get the necessary equipment, but he had not been able to do so”.
In a toast Gladding mentioned Robert Farrell, who was present representing the City Council. Mr Farrell, replying, said “It is quite true that ex-Superintendent Hughes frequently asked for up-to-date appliances, and could not get them. The reason was that the City Council had not the funds to spare. We all saw the necessity for them, and the Mayor was heartily in favour, but the items could not be got till the new loan was floated. Plans for a new fire brigade station had been prepared years ago and I believe the brigade won’t have to wait long now till it was furnished with all buildings and appliances to bring it up to the efficiency, in that respect, of the Southern fire brigades. The Mayor has set his heart on that”.
So here was the new Fire Chief reflecting on the former Chief’s inability to get adequate funding from the City Council and calling out its failure to improve fire protection, followed by a Councillor’s acceptance that the City Council, although well-intentioned, had not moved as it should have.
The brigade, thus, could hardly be blamed, in the circumstances, for any shortfalls.
Gladding tweaked rules and procedures during his first meeting with the Brigade on 14th July 1899 but there could be no announcement about improvements to basic firefighting equipment. This was beyond his control: he was no “new broom sweeping clean”. It was up to the City Council to provide. 7
A New Century
There was a new decade, and a new century with the arrival of 1900. A convenient milestone to have a stock-take of the Auckland Fire Brigade.
Fire Station: occupied since 1873, long-since judged unfit for purpose. New premises planned.
Fire Pumps: none. A retrograde step since in 1860 there were 4 pumps available in Auckland
Ladder: Extending Merryweather ladder acquired in 1884 but was unsuitable and reluctantly used
Horse-drawn wagons to transport firefighters to fires: none
Horse-drawn hose reels: 1. Transports Superintendent, horse hired from neighbouring private stables
Horses dedicated to the brigade’s needs 24 x 7: none. In 1867 two horses had been provided by Council
Hose reels drawn by firefighters: 4
Ladder carts drawn by firefighters: 1
Lookout from the Fire Bell Tower: None. Lookouts used to be rostered 24 x 7: since abandoned.
Electric Alarm System: none. The system installed in 1882 was defunct
Major Fires Don’t Wait #2 March 2 1900
Fire swept through the Loan and Mercantile’s waterfront warehouse fuelled by wool, gum and flax. Gladding and his men could only protect adjoining buildings before getting hoses into the interior. The building and its contents were lost.
In March 1900 the City Council did not have appetite to fund outstanding fire brigade matters, shelving a report from Gladding who said that a steam fire engine, as that being offered for sale by T. Hall and Company, would be of great advantage in Auckland, as buildings are now much higher and larger than previously “Had we had a steam engine at the recent Loan and Mercantile fire, the result would have been very different, as we would have been able to make use of sea water’. 8. The report was referred to a Committee.
Prolonged drought in 1900 had reduced the levels in the reservoirs with concern about sufficient supplies for fire-fighting. Conservation measures were put in place across Auckland. And Councillors were also preoccupied with a major fallout over alleged discrepancies in the Council’s accounts with the Treasurer under cross-examination.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #3 March 13 1900
Mrs Carter’s 14-roomed boarding house in Waterloo Quadrant was gutted in a blaze so fierce that locals thought Government House was on fire.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #4 March 20 1900
Flames took out what was left of a bakery in Airedale Street following an earlier fire in the premises. This time the place was gutted.
In April the City Council’s concentration switched to prevention of the bubonic plaque spreading in Auckland: the fire brigade assisted as a precaution in this by standing-by as a precautionary measure when rat-infested, plague-prone, buildings were burned down under decree by health authorities.
In early November 1900 the City Council revealed it had been considering construction of a new fire station. It did not have a site… Wakefield Street had been mentioned… and resolved to advertise, seeking suitable land with a preference for Pitt Street or Hobson Street. During this discussion there were several other revelations. Councillor Robert Salmon said that “the city’s fire appliances were quite inadequate, and required renovating. They are quite insufficient to cope with a large fire”. Councillor James Stichbury said “I went past the present station today and I think that the sanitary commissioner should condemn it… the place is only fit for a stable”. The Mayor, David Goldie, then got to the nub – “the difficulty lies in the fact that we’ve been endeavouring to get the insurance companies and the Government to bear a part of the cost of the fire brigade. We have endeavoured to get a Bill through, but the member in charge, Mr. Witheford, has not succeeded”.9
The mayor and council should have known not to rely on a Fire Brigades’ Act to determine funding… it must have been seen as a doubtful lifeline. The measure had been discussed, amended and delayed since 1891: 10 years of political dithering with no result. Other local councils had not depended on the possibility of the Act to provide alternative funding: they had ensured fire protection in their communities by funding facilities from property rates, and in some instances, with contributions from insurance companies and subscription. In this respect, Auckland seemed to be the stand-out: no capital had been made available regularly to update fire engines and equipment, while the bare minimum was budgeted for operating expenses.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #5 January 12 1901
The city’s biggest fire to date destroyed three large buildings … the downtown warehouses of Bond and Bell, L. D. Nathan and Owen and Company, while both Mackey’s and Laurie’s premises were badly damaged. Total loss was some £100,000, a new high for the city. 10
The Observer newspaper, 19th January 1901, was moved to asked, in its column “They Say…”, “…that everyone was asking everyone else who it was that was running the Fire Brigade on Sunday – the Mayor or Gladding?” This was mocking reference to the fact that Mayor went to the fire to, reportedly, “render assistance”.
Following this fire the Fire Brigade Committee of the City Council agreed “to consider purchase of tall ladders”. 11 Later in the month the Council approved Superintendent Gladding undertaking a tour to study southern brigades in New Zealand and to a number in Australia.
On his return Gladding reported that he found all the brigades he visited were far superior to Auckland and he compared them to his Brigade.12
New central fire station opened” – Auckland has been planning one for years
“4 horses on station day and night at the ready” – Auckland has none
“Electric fire alarm system being extended” – Auckland has none
Has 2 steamers and a chemical appliance” – Auckland has none
“Has an extension ladder” – Auckland has one (1884 model) not satisfactory
80 volunteer members” – Auckland has about a handful
Horse drawn Hook and ladder truck to carry firemen” – Auckland has none
Full-time paid firefighters, rostered day and night
Firefighters employed in station chores
Most facilities are electric. All appliances are horse-drawn
High pressures in water mains to assist firefighting
Sydney uses, exclusively, steamer pumps
Sydney has telephone system to give fire alarms
At all the places I visited horse-drawn carts are used to transport men and equipment to the scene of the fire – such is not the case in Auckland”.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #6 April 17th 1901
Lambourne and Dewar’s premises on Ponsonby Road were gutted by fire, consisting their showrooms and several adjacent retail stores. Ponsonby firefighters were already at work when Gladding and his men arrived but “the men who took the hook and ladder carriage had to drag it a mile to the fire up College Hill, and were exhausted by their exertions, and not in a fit condition to fight a serious fire, but did their very best” 13. Others noted it was 15 minutes before Ponsonby Fire Brigade got water to the fire. 14
Major Fires Don’t Wait #7 March 25 1901
The aging Army Drill Hall which had served Auckland since the 1860s was gutted in an early morning fire posing risks to firefighters with exploding munitions and red-hot sheets of iron cascading from the roof. Arms, uniforms and military stores, along with records, were lost.
Major Fires Don’t Wait #8 May 13 1901
Fire made a clean-sweep of J D Roberts and Company’s confectionery works. Parnell Brigadesmen were on the scene within 15 minutes but were unable to get to work because their gear did not fit City hydrant fittings. Firefighters from City Station arrived soon after but their fire-fight by that stage was to no avail.15
Major Fires Don’t Wait #9 May 31st 1901
In the wee small hours an unstoppable blaze swept through the fashionable Grand Hotel in Princes Street .The building was gutted, five people lost their lives and a number of people were injured.16
The course, and cost, of this destructive fire showed that all the major losses suffered before had not been acted upon, the fire brigade remained deficient and that major fires don’t wait. This fire, unlike previous blazes, could not be ignored by the City Councillors who, alone, were those responsible for funding the fire brigade, overseeing water supplies and inspecting/approving hotel fire escapes.
Public outcry was immediate and scathing. Angry townspeople blamed the City Council for failing to provide sufficient funds for the rundown Fire Brigade. Local Members of Parliament loudly censured the City Fathers. Some outraged citizens, wanting to sheet home the responsibility for the Grand Hotel fire, seriously suggested that all the City Councillors should be arrested and charged with manslaughter.
“A Sufferer” wrote to the editor of the Auckland Star, June 3rd, 1901: “ Sir, Is it possible to indict the City Council on a charge of manslaughter for causing the death of Mr Johnston’s three little children and other inmates at the Grand Hotel fire? If a citizen neglected his duty in such a barefaced manner as the City Council has, and showed such utter callousness for the safety of those whoso lives and property were entrusted to his care, it would not be long before he found himself in the dock preparatory to a lengthened term in Mt. Eden Prison. Why, then, should the City Council escape? Why are the brigade expected to do horses’ work, dragging ladders, etc., to a fire, and then turn to and do a night’s work. It is a standing disgrace to our city authorities, and they ought to be made to account for it, [t redounds to the credit of the brigade that the city has not been devastated over and over again. A braver or more willing lot of men could not be found, and they simply work wonders with the appliances at their disposal”.
An editorial in the New Zealand Herald was very critical of the Council saying it had ignored repeated requests over the decades from various Fire Chiefs to improve the Brigade’s equipment. “It was shown (at an earlier major fire) that the appliances at hand were so inadequate as to be farcical”…. “we are always just about to do something but fire after fire occurs and the better machinery is in the future”… “the history of Auckland in connection with this subject is simply disgraceful, disgraceful in the first place to those who have been in power in civic positions, and disgraceful to every citizen who tolerated such criminal neglect of duty.” 17. Cartoons in the Press unmercifully lampooned the unready state of the Brigade.
*Some of this text is reprinted from my other item on this site “The Grand Hotel Fire 1901 – A Turning Point”
(In 2018 work began to redevelop the sites of the old Grand Hotel and, next door, the Masonic Building. Their facades were retained, a high-rise block combining both properties emerged, completed in October 2020)
A correspondent with the pen-name “Excelsior” had a letter published in the New Zealand Herald a week before the Grand Hotel fire. It condemned what had been evident at recent fires: inadequate and ancient fire-fighting resources. A few days after the Grand Hotel fire “Excelsior” wrote again: “I have now the melancholy satisfaction of saying ‘I told you so’ and cannot contemplate the scene of the latest fire without feeling that the city fathers are guilty of culpable negligence. I trust the City Council will now ensure the city is made a safe place in which to do business and to live”.
Questions were also asked about installation of the fire escapes that had proven so hopelessly inadequate during the fire. How was it that they had been erected inside the premises when both the Fire Chief and head of the Salvage Corps advised the builder to install the ladders on the outside of the building? The result was there were no escapes on the exterior of the building.
The Artful Dodgers
The Chamber of Commerce, representing a wide-spread of businessmen in the town, called a meeting to tell those in authority, the City Council, that Auckland’s fire protection just would not do, and demanded immediate improvement. The meeting became heated as those present said who, exactly, they thought was responsible: City Councillors over the years. And then the defensive replies from those serving Councillors who had been caught napping. 18
Why were there inadequate water supplies for firefighting?
No amount of water could have put out the hotel fire.
And why were the City’s waterworks projects running so far behind schedule?
Bad weather has delayed construction and pipes will not be connected with the Waitakere dam until two summers hence.
Next, an effective alarm system was required: there was no bell to signal fires in the East Ward… this was called an “impossible situation”.
The bell has been deployed elsewhere.
How come there were no horses to haul appliances to the fire: this had to be done by the men themselves, sapping their energy? Fire brigade arrangements are behind the times, the meeting heard, especially men pulling that hook and ladder carriage. But the brigade itself was not to blame – the men did what they could with the appliances they had, but was it not time an up-to-date horse-drawn service was obtained for the city?
Council has been remiss in not supporting the brigade for years but it had recently ordered new appliances.
Why had Council not been given specifications for a horse-drawn ladder?.
Nothing further had been heard. It had been shelved.
And what of the promised new fire station in Pitt Street – was it subject to the same procrastination?
The Council had some time ago received designs for a new fire brigade station, and the Mayor assured his intention to carry the matter through.
Then criticism of the fire brigade. Why is the present Council department not “organised in any shape or form? It should have a thoroughly up-to-date man, capable of organising the whole department, of making every firefighter efficient in every detail, and of running the brigade on the same principles as characterised the greatest fire brigades in the old world”.
Council said it would be making changes.
The meeting asked why the question of fire escapes had not been gone into by the Council as it had absolute power in the matters of design and enforcement? Why had fire escapes been included in the whole question of inspection of buildings but the Council had come up short at the Grand Hotel?
Council said it had once been the Police’s job: Council took over inspections only very recently and would be getting on with it.
It was pointed out that in other countries Insurance Companies contributed much to the upkeep of fire brigades: why does this not occur in New Zealand?
The response was that the Companies deal in risk and premiums would drop commensurate with a lesser risk when there was a competent fire brigade with proven water supplies.
Finally, the topic came up questioning the calibre of Council members who had allegedly delayed, or made poor decisions, about Auckland’s fire protection.
“I consider”, said one man, “that until we do away with the ward system we will not got the proper stamp of men to represent us in the Council” .
David Goldie, Mayor when the Council had made some of the allegedly bad decisions, spoke up in defence of the city’s fire appliances, rebutting comments made at the Chamber of Commerce meeting.
“There are horses in the stable next door to the station that are always there when required by the fire brigade”.
“If the ex-Mayor had said”, the New Zealand Herald challenged, “a horse instead of horses, he would have been right. One horse, and one only, can be used. That is the arrangement between the Council and a nearby stable. And the horse is not a special one, not kept there for the purpose, and not consequently fresh, but it’s any horse, which perhaps has been out all day and is tired out. The other horses are the members, the men, of the fire brigade!”
More tough talk: the Memorial Service
A memorial service for the victims was held in St Andrews Church, during which the preacher, the Reverend Mr Gray, was not hesitant in his message to those elected to the City Council. From the pulpit he said “I am sure we wish them to understand that, cost what it may, such a calamity as this must be made forever impossible in the City of Auckland. We demand an end to all delay and procrastination in this connection… … what is money when it is the lives of our little children that are at stake?” 19
As with all loss of life, and serious fires, the Grand Hotel fire was subject to an inquest to determine the cause, whether recommendations for improvement were justified and to decide if any criminal charges should result. 20
There were some telling statements made reflecting the state of the fire brigade at the time:
- “There’s no one on lookout duty on the tower overnight” – Moss Keesing, Fireman
- “We rely on bells and telephones to give the alarm, here are no street alarms” – Moss Keesing, Fireman
- A Juror asked if it was true that Auckland was well behind other centres in the provision of firefighting. Superintendent Gladding replied “Auckland City Council intends largely improving the plant, erecting a new station, and introducing an up-to-date system of alarms” . “In the sweet by-and-by, I suppose,” was the Juror’s lament.
- “A steam pump is necessary for buildings in the higher parts of the city such as those where the Grand Hotel was” – Superintendent Gladding
- “Ladders and jumping-sheets are the only appliances we have in ‘Auckland for life-saving purposes” – Superintendent Gladding to which the Coroner said “And this is the 20th century!”
- A Juror asked : You are entirely at the mercy of the City Council as to whether you get the necessary appliances, or not? Superintendent Gladding- “Yes”
- “Ladders are taken to the scene of fire by hand on a carriage. The process is necessarily a slow one as the carriage and ladders (six in all, of different sizes) weighed 11 cwt.” –Superintendent Gladding.
- “Had I been asked if the well was a suitable place for fire-escapes I would have said ‘no – those escapes lead people into danger, instead of out of it’” – Captain Field, Officer In Charge of the Salvage Corps.
The Coroner – Censuring
The Inquest was damning of the City Council.
- Previous Fire Chiefs had repeatedly sought funds for new equipment, but to no avail.
- Fire-fighting at the Grand Hotel had not begun in a timely way:
- There was a late alarm given to the Albert Street station
- Firemen had to man-handle their equipment, pushing and pulling it up to Princes Street via what’s known today as Victoria Street East and Bowen Avenue.
- Occupants told how the fire raced along wooden linings and wall-boards, the flames engulfing everything it touched.
- Firefighters were handicapped by low water pressure: hoses could not effectively fight the flames above street level.
- Inside the hotel there were confusing signs pointing to emergency exits.,
- The signs led to an unsafe route – two vertical iron ladders descending an enclosed shaft to the enclosed yard below.
The Coroner’s findings might have been enough to move the City Council to take immediate action to remedy the shortcomings. But there were other accumulated factors also pressuring the Council to act.
On top of public sympathy and concern about the loss of life, and 3 youngsters at that in the Grand Hotel blaze, townspeople recalled all the other major fires, all with severe losses.
Another factor that the Council had overlooked with its blasé attitude about fire protection was that the city had grown outwards with burgeoning suburbs. And upwards. Auckland city no longer comprised only simply constructed single-storied wooden cottages, shop premises and warehouses. The few ladders the Brigade owned were inadequate for the “high rise” buildings of the day and those ladders that were available were despatched to fires on a retired ex City Council hand cart, dragged along by two firemen running at-the-double until slowed by exhaustion.
Auckland was also growing outwards. It became unreasonable to expect firemen to run the distances to the new areas dragging their reels and carts behind them. It left little energy to fight the fire when they eventually got there.
Ratepayers Pay Higher Insurance Premiums
Agitation for the Council to upgrade the Brigade came from other quarters. The newly formed Ratepayers’ Association, keen for a cause to flex its youthful muscles, loudly condemned the Council’s history of inaction, accurately reflecting wider public opinion which quickly turned to dismay when underwriters, seeing the risk involving poor fire fire protection and the old brigade’s equipment, increased premiums for fire insurance.
Influential citizens lobbied the Council, some of whom had personal experience of the deficient Brigade. The likes of Davis and Nathan, along with other leading businessmen, had seen fire destroy their premises and businesses, with heavy losses, not all of them covered by insurance.
Members of the Masonic Lodge, among them pillars of Auckland society, also spoke up. The Masons realised that had the wind changed direction during the Grand Hotel blaze it would have taken the flames towards their premises, probably consuming their building, too.
All this pressure, coupled with the Inquest’s critical findings, meant the City Council found it had no option but to act.
The result was that the Superintendent of Wellington Fire Brigade, Captain Thomas Hugo, was called in to investigate the Auckland Brigade and advise what was wanted to bring it up to modern standards.
Hugo candidly set out his findings which included recommendations for the improvement of every part of fire brigade’s operations: he found that no one element had been properly provided for by the City Council. 20.
See Appendix A, below, for a summary of Hugo’s recommendations.
So it was up to the City Council to face up to the shortcomings in the fire brigade and to consider implementing Captain Hugo’s recommendations to overhaul it. There was a £12,000 price tag.
In adopting the report, Councillors’ discussions still showed some of them were reticent to act.
Mr Hannan: “I think the matter should not be hurried on. We are rushing the whole thing owing to the recent disaster. Prices of material were at present very high, and it would be injudicious for the Council to plunge while the market was in that state.
Mr Court countered this “This is no reason for delay, that the price of materials is high. The difference this would make in the cost of the scheme would be trifling compared with the loss occasioned by a big fire. If another big fire were to occur, what would people think of the Council?
Mr Hannan again “has the Committee considered the possibility of legislation on the matter of fire brigade maintenance?”
On the matter of a look-out at night, Mr Kidd: “Mr Hugo tells us this is not so important as was generally thought. Mr Hugo replied “I said that with fire alarms it was not important, but at present there should certainly be a look-out”.
The Superintendent’s Future
Again there was diverse discussion, but in the end it was agreed Gladding could not continue as Superintendent.
Alfred Kidd: “We are now proposing a large scheme involving the training of 30 men in all departments. It would not be fair to Superintendent Gladding to put him in that position, seeing he has not the requisite knowledge and experience”.
John Hannan dissented. “It’s unfair. Superintendent Gladding has not had a fair chance. The appliances have not been satisfactory, and now he has to be punished for the shortcomings of the Council”.
John Hewson: I want to ask Superintendent Hugo if he considers it necessary to terminate Superintendent Gladding’s engagement. (The question was ruled unfair to Captain Hugo)
Alfred Kidd: “Superintendent Gladding had done fairly good work with the appliances at his command, but the city is behind the times, and it must progress as other cities have done.
John Hewson: It must be said that some time ago the present Superintendent wrote to the Council asking for up-to-date appliances. It is only fair to state this”.
Arthur Rosser: “I feel sure that to put Superintendent Gladding in charge of the up-to-date plant we propose to establish would be unfair to him”.
Mr Frederick Baume: “I am prepared to bear my part of the responsibility attached to the report”.
Christopher John Parr: “This matter must be hurried on. If we do not, we will be hurried out of municipal life ourselves”
Captain Hugo’s report and recommendations were accepted: after decades of neglect the Auckland Fire Brigade would at last have a make-over, bringing it up to date with modern equipment and practices.
The Councillors would go to the community with a poll asking for approval to borrow £12,000 to finance Hugo’s plan. 21
They could not see Herbert Gladding leading a reformed brigade. He was relieved of his job, demoted to Deputy and Charles Woolley from Port Adelaide in Australia was recruited for the top job.
Gladding’s predecessor Jim Hughes was “retrenched”, retired, after it was alleged he bungled fire-fighting at the DSC building in Queen Street in February 1898.
It must be observed in hindsight that the only deficiency was the Council’s, which left Hughes with antiquated equipment to fight a fire involving a large downtown multi-storey building.
And then along came the fatal Grand Hotel fire where once again the Council’s short-funding of the fire brigade was crystal-clear to everyone: to the Press, the Chamber of Commerce, the bereaved, townsfolk, the Coroner and Captain Hugo.
But the Council did not shoulder the responsibility. Councillors once again blamed the Superintendent. This time Herbert Gladding was the scapegoat. He was stood down, the Superintendent’s position advertised in Situations Vacant columns.
In October and November 1901 Herbert Gladding was farewelled at a series of gatherings with presentation of suitable gifts: within the year he had entered business on his own account, opening a grocery shop. His wife, Emma, died in March 1904 and in July his son, Arnold, aged 20, died of injuries sustained while firefighting at the Morrin’s warehouse blaze. Herbert died on Christmas Day 1908 and rests in the family plot at Waikumete cemetery.
Summary of Captain Thomas Hugo’s recommendations.
In hindsight his blueprint, and the passing of the Fire Brigades’ Act in 1906 which took administration from local Councils passing it to Fire Boards, were foundation blocks of modern fire services in Auckland.
- A street fire alarm system installed to give the best means of giving the alarm
- The site of the proposed fire station in Pitt Street is appropriate
- The design of the proposed station is not: and Hugo gave his ideas
- New station to accommodate superintendent, 2 married men and 14 single men
- Brigade should be staffed – superintendent, foreman, 9 permanent men and 6 auxiliaries
- Second station in downtown Queen Street, not as planned
- Third station in Ponsonby
- All single men to be provided quarters, light, and uniform, bed and bedding
- The mess to be provided with coal, crockery and cooking etc
- Auxiliary Staff of 24 men to be paid £5 per annum for the first year, £15 per annum thereafter
- Nine horses are required, two to be stronger three-quarter-bred animals
- Requirements are 1 fire engine, 450 gallons capacity, 1 fire engine 350 gallons capacity, 1 two-horse hose reel, 1 two-horse hose and ladder cart.
- 4,000 feet of new hose
- capital expenditure required is about £11,000
- cost of maintenance is about £800 per annum
- water pressures through Auckland are good for firefighting except in the higher places
- steam fire engines required as a priority response in these higher areas.
- New Zealand Herald 17th July 1899
- Z. Government – Census
- Various Brigade histories and National Library of N. Z.
- Hugo – Report to Auckland City Council
- Auckland Star 13th January 1883
- New Zealand Herald 17th July 1899
- Auckland Star 15th July 1899
- New Zealand Herald March 23rd 1900
- New Zealand Herald 2nd November 1900
- New Zealand Herald 14th January 1901
- New Zealand herald 17th January 1901
- New Zealand Herald 10th April 1901
- New Zealand Herald 17th April 1901
- Observer 20th April 1901
- New Zealand Herald 14th May 1901
- New Zealand Herald 31st May 1901
- New Zealand Herald 1st June 1901
- New Zealand Herald 4th June 1901
- Auckland Star 3rd June 1901
- New Zealand Herald 6th July 1901
- Auckland Star, 5th July 1901
Papers Past, National Library of New Zealand
“United to Protect – An Historical Account of the Auckland Fire Brigade 1848 – 1985”- G. M. Gillon, Orion Press 1985
History of Auckland Fire Brigade – C. Mears
On this site “The Grand Hotel Fire 1901 – a Turning Point” and “The Sensational Witness – Inquest into the Grand Hotel Fire”
RCC May 2020