On two occasions over the decades, in 1902 and 1927, Aucklanders have been rattled by a series of arsons and false alarms to the fire brigade, not knowing when and where the incendiarists would strike next. Both in 1902 and 1927 the fires continued and the brigade was given the run-around for weeks before it was found youths were responsible.

1902 – A Fascination

When the brand-new Central Fire Station was officially opened with pomp and circumstance on July 3rd 1902, there could be no idea of the most unfortunate consequences which were to unravel in coming weeks.

Among those gathered to watch the ceremony were two youths who were impressed with the new station and the recently-acquired equipment. For the first time during opening festivities they could get close to the horses and appliances: the glistening brass on the bridles, the smell of neats-foot oil on leather and then there was the harness, specially hung overhead, ready to drop down and get hitched to the horses immediately there was a fire alarm.

First responding appliance poses outside the new Central Fire Station, July 1902
Weekly News: Sir George Grey Special Collections, Auckland Libraries, 7-A9732

The two boys, looking around, could imagine the front doors suddenly flung open, the firemen’s immediate response to the fire bells and the horses galloping away on their urgent mission.

The fire brigade eventually moved most of its equipment and men into the new station and by 17th July 1902 all was in readiness to respond from their new station. Firefighters did not have to wait long. At three o’clock next morning they were called to a blaze in Parnell. Roberts Biscuit Company’s factory was well alight, a major blaze which taxed both the Parnell and Auckland Fire Brigades plus the Salvage Corps. The Auckland Star noted “This was the first turn-out of the city brigade since their installation in their new premises, and the smartness with which they arrived on the scene of the fire and commenced with incredible rapidity, four hydrants began placing upon the flames”. It was the second devastating fire within a year for the Roberts Company.

Roberts’ factory after the fire. Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections AWNS-19020724-12-3

In late August the Auckland Fire Brigade’s brand new horse-drawn telescopic ladder was commissioned at Central Station and the two boys who were fascinated by the brigade on Opening Day later admitted they were thrilled to see it turning out to fires. The new horse-drawn ladder could reach 65 feet (20m).

Busy Brigade

The new equipment was certainly being put to good use. By the end of the day on Saturday 6th September the Auckland Fire Brigade had attended 8 fires within nine and a half hours, a record. But Superintendent Woolley was suspicious.

Superintendent Charles Woolley
Auckland Libraries Sir George Grey Collection

Some of the outbreaks looked like arson – it appeared fire-lighters were at work. Mr Woolley’s contention was confirmed when, day after day, firemen were called to outbreaks which all looked like the results of incendiarists. At different places downtown there were fires in sheds, office blocks, a warehouse or two, a dwelling and, on several occasions, in bushes beside the road. Fortunately all had been contained, notwithstanding some had been assisted by accelerants. The calls were almost one a day. But there had been even more outbreaks. Police had been alerted to other fires that people had come across and that had been put out, and to which the brigade had not been summoned.

September 27th rolled around. It was to be another busy time for firemen with 5 calls before mid-afternoon.

The first, at around 2.30pm, was to Mrs Mary Graham’s boarding-house at the top of Shortland Street where passersby spotted a fire and prevented it getting hold. Mrs Graham was away from the house at the time. From the street, two men saw the flames in the front room, broke into the house and managed to get the better of the fire which was consuming blinds and curtains. The fire brigade checked the rest of the place: but, otherwise, had nothing to do. They were then directed to smoke showing from a shed behind William Beattie’s shop in Shortland Street. It was an incipient, but suspicious fire. Almost at the same time a passerby drew fire-fighters’ attention to another small blaze in Lee’s cooperage in nearby Chancery Street. Firemen found it had been broken into, so added it to the list of deliberately lit outbreaks. There were two further fires that day: paper on fire in the Victoria Arcade and toi-toi bushes alight in Beach Road.

Police Make Their Move

Detectives had been well aware of the suspicious fires and were looking for the culprit. They decided the fires might have been the work of two youths, whom, police noted, were present at all, or most, of the events. Detective McMahon, detailed to look into the arsons, had noticed the two lads and decided to question them. He had been in Shortland Street soon after the fires were reported there and came across one of the youths very near where all the action had been earlier in the afternoon. McMahon accused the youth of causing the fires, and seizing the opportunity of an unguarded word, succeeded in bluffing him into a confession. The lad gave his name as James Henry Sargent aged 15 of Balfour Road, Parnell.  On being further pressed he admitted being the cause, in company with a friend, of the series of fires which had occurred over the past month. He named his cohort as another 15 year old, Arthur Ruddle of Napier Street. Both were later arrested and Ruddle, on learning that Sargent had confessed, confirmed the truth of his mate’s statement. Both youths were locked up awaiting appearance in the Police Court next day, where they would be facing 18 charges of arson and several of breaking and entering. At the first hearing the Magistrate remanded them in custody while police completed their inquiries. At their second appearance the police called some 35 witnesses who gave evidence of finding a fire in their premises, or having been broken into with signs that there had been attempts to start a fire. Kerosene, methylated spirits, paper tapers, shavings, straw, tarpaulins and matches were frequently mentioned in evidence.

Motive

The Clerk of the Court read out their statements which were similar. Sargent said the idea of lighting fires originated some five or six week earlier, about the time of the opening of the new fire station. He and Ruddle were talking about the new fire appliances, and spoke how much fun it would be to see the brigade galloping to a fire.

The youths had been especially impressed with the new ladder, MOTAT Collection

They talked the matter over, and made appointments to meet from time to time and the result was the various fires listed on the charge-sheet. He said the usual practice was for one boy to keep watch while the other lit the fire: both would then run away for a short distance, and when the brigade came along, accompany it to the fire. On some occasions they helped firemen extinguish the flames. On the occasion of the fire in Hobson’s Buildings, Sargent admitted he lit it alone because Ruddle had failed to keep an appointment. The statements gave detailed particulars of the meetings, and the lighting of the various fires, all of which were fortunately suppressed in the initial stages. The fire at Gillespie’s kerosene bond was set by pouring methylated spirits and kerosene around the door, and pushing a lighted stick (around which a rag soaked in kerosene was wrapped) under the door. The blaze at Beattie’s was also started with kerosene.

On the accused being charged, both said they had nothing to say, and pleaded guilty to all the charges. They were committed to the Supreme Court for sentence. The magistrate, T. Hutchison, indicated he would not allow bail: the two would have to await their next trial in jail. Mr Ruddle applied on behalf of his son. His Worship said he did not like refusing boys bail, but in this case the responsibility was too great for him to accept, and he must refuse bail. Chief-Detective Grace said that the boys had been confined on the female side of the gaol, and whilst there one of them had attempted to borrow a match from a female prisoner to set fire to a padded cell. His Worship repeated that the responsibility of allowing bail would be too great for him to undertake. The boys were then removed to custody awaiting a sentence in the Supreme Court.

The Sentence

On 12 November 1902 James Henry Sargent and Arthur Ruddle appeared in the Supreme Court before Mr Justice Connolly for sentence on the charges of arson.

Mr Justice Connolly
N Z Graphic Sir George Grey Special Collections, Auckland Libraries, NZG -19081111-20-12

His Honour read the Probation Officer’s report, which he found an unfavourable one. The Judge said it was extremely difficult to arrive at a decision what to do in such cases. He sentenced each prisoner to a total of seven years’ imprisonment, the sentences to be concurrent.

The Charges

The two went to jail having pleaded guilty to the following charges, jointly faced:

“Did wilfully set fire to…

Gillespie’s kerosene store, Beach Road, (August 30)

toi-toi grass, Mills Lane (September 1)

toi-toi grass in Albert Bark (September 6)

toi-toi grass in Princes Street (September 6)

building owned by J. A. Knight, Lorne Street (September 6)

paper in a shed owned by R. C. Horton (September 6)

shavings in Tolson and Garlick and Co.’s factory (September 6)

timber in Tolson Garlick and Co.’s factory (September 6)

leaves of a book in Hobson’s Buildings, Shortland Street. (September 6)

straw and shavings on Winks and Hall’s premises, Shortland Street (September 8)

sacks at the Central Mission Hall (September 9)

wilfully damaging a tarpaulin, the property of Jas. Ferguson, by setting fire to same, doing injury to extent of 15s (September 12)

paper in a building owned by the Mutual Life Association (September 20)

paper in the N.Z. Insurance office, Victoria Arcade (September 27)

shed owned by Wm. Beattie (September 27);

wilfully breaking and entering dwelling of F. A. Lees and setting fire thereto (September 27)

breaking and entering Mary Graham’s house, Shortland Street, and setting fire to curtains (Sept 27)

toi-toi grass at Beach Road (September 27)

J. D. Roberts and Company’s Biscuit factory which was destroyed by fire on 18th July 1902 was added to the list after the two boys, who in January 1903, while serving their sentence, admitted they set the place alight. This triggered the brigade’s first turnout from the new fire headquarters in Pitt Street which had been fully commissioned just the day before.

Follow-up

James Henry Sargent subsequently appeared before the courts on various dishonesty charges: in 1906 he received six years’ jail on a number of charges. Once released he offended again, and again. He was convicted of theft and breaking and entry committed in Wellington, Manawatu, Christchurch and Southland. In 1913 a judge named him “a habitual criminal”.

Notwithstanding, at the age of 30  and employed in Inglewood as a butcher, Sargent enlisted on 31st March 1917 for active service abroad in World War One. Among other units he served with the 3rd New Zealand Entrenching Battalion digging trenches and other earthworks and being part of a pool of troops able to be mobilised to the front. He received severe gunshot wounds and was hospitalised, later transported home and discharged in May 1919 where he was rated 100 per cent disabled. His wartime trauma led to alcoholism … and a return to crime.

He began using several aliases – William John Walsh, James Geoffrey Graham and Ernest Watters and his repeated offending meant he spent a good deal of his life in jail.

“What is your real name? “

One of his last appearances was in Southland in 1927 after being charged with breaking and entering and theft in Riversdale. Having become by then thoroughly conversant with the court process, he enjoyed the liberty of cross-examining witnesses and addressing the jury. After which he would then inevitably plead guilty and launch a plea in mitigation to the Judge. On the occasion of his appearance in the Supreme Court in Invercargill for the Riversdale episode he told the Judge that drink was his demon after the rigours of war, but crime seemed uppermost in his mind. He said there was little hope for him in prison – he had been there so many times before – and perhaps detention on a working farm might be better for him. The Judge resisted the suggestion and sent Sargent back to jail… but before doing so he asked “what is your real name? – you have so many aliases!” The answer was “James Henry Sargent”. He had earlier told the Court that he used aliases so as not to besmirch his family’s name. Mr Justice Sim sentenced Sargent to two years in jail and again declared him ‘a habitual criminal’.

James Henry Sargent is last recorded before the court in Auckland in 1941 on a charge of theft and he was sentenced to two years’ probation, to live and work at Ohakune.

He died in November 1956 and is buried at Waikaraka Cemetery, Onehunga, Auckland.

1927 “A campaign of plundering and incendiarism…”

 

As with the 1902 series of arsons, the episode in 1927 was unveiled by a major fire. Flames swept through the classrooms at Normal School in Wellesley Street East (site of AUT buildings today) about 5pm on Sunday 3rd July. Firefighters arrived to find the place well involved and got to work to cut the flames off from the rear of the old wooden building.

Auckland Normal School before the fire
Sir George Grey Special Collections, Auckland Libraries, 4-2022

Fire Chief Bill Wilson said it had been taxing work, the flames had a good hold and he was certain it was arson. Thick black smoke billowed across Wellesley Street into Albert Park and on towards Princes Street. The loss of about half the school’s classrooms, teaching aids and teacher’s personal property was major: the following week the pupils had to be diverted to Newton East School to continue their lessons.

Superintendent William Wilson, Auckland Fire Brigades’ Museum and Historical Society

Fire Chief Wilson told the press that it was apparent that the fire had been building up inside for some time before showing itself, so it was a very hot fire and he also said that it appeared the blaze was deliberately lit: it had started in a pile of old car tyres stacked in the basement. On inquiry, the headmaster told reporters the old tyres had been collected as a means of fundraising for the school library. Detectives investigated the cause of the fire.

Arrests

Within days three youths had been arrested, one aged 15 the others 14. Two were charged with setting fire to the Normal School and all three with breaking and entering. They appeared in Court on 8th July. The Auckland Star observed “all appeared clad in short trousers with their socks rolled down to their boot-tops in the style affected by gangs of youths who roam round the Newton and Ponsonby districts”. The three were remanded in custody after police told the court that it was not safe to let them free. Chief Detective Cumming thought he should give them a warning before they left the dock. “Now you boys are to understand that while you are at the Probation Home you are not to get up to any tricks, such as playing with matches or setting fire to the building, otherwise you will be taken to Mount Eden Gaol”.

“All right, sir!” they all chorused.

More Charges

When the three appeared in Police Court a week later they faced a total of 54 charges. As well as Normal School they were accused of 10 further cases of arson, numerous occasions of breaking and entering plus theft. And two more young offenders were also in the dock jointly charged with setting the fire at Normal School. Detective Knight told the court that some of the accused were noticed by Detective Sinclair and himself at the time of the Normal School fire. Three days later the eldest boy made a statement admitting all the offences with which he was now charged. The other four were interviewed the following day and made statements admitting their guilt. A revolver, bicycle and first-aid outfit were recovered from one boy and some stamps from another, while a third said he had disposed of his portion of the spoil. The detective said the two others were not really implicated in the whole series of offences. On July 3 they had been sent to Sunday School, but instead went to Myers Park, where they met the other three. They were present when the Normal School was set on fire, but took no active part in the crime.

The magistrate, William McKean, said he did not think the evidence against the two boys was sufficient for them to be sent to the Supreme Court. They could be adequately dealt with in the Children’s Court. But the other three who had pleaded guilty were committed to the Supreme Court for sentence.

Sentences

The two boys involved in “a mild way” were sentenced in the Children’s Court to supervision. Mrs. Ferner, JP, told the mother of the boys that “stricter control is necessary and that there must be no going out at night”.

The other three appeared in the Supreme Court for sentence.

“This is, I think, the worst instance of juvenile crime I have had to deal with,” said Mr. Justice Herdman. ”How to assess an appropriate punishment is a question of difficulty… the offenders for weeks were engaged in a campaign of plundering and incendiarism and the damage done by them in their short career of crime ran into between £3,000 and £4,000. The case is one which cannot lightly be dismissed with a motherly pat on the head and an injunction not to do it again”.

Mr Justice Herdman. Auckland Libraries Heritage Collection

The Judge said he found it difficult to find his way through the tangled maze of legislation which in New Zealand deals with the punishment of crime. “I have no power to punish by ordering a birching so the two elder boys will be detained in the Borstal Institution for a term of not less than two years, the minimum term prescribed by the Act. The other defendant should, I think, be with the other lads, and I will suggest this to the authorities. What happens to these offenders will depend upon their good behaviour and upon the will of the Executive regarding their release from Borstal”.

One of the two was a frequent defendant in the courts over following decades charged with minor thefts, false pretences and possession of stolen goods.

 

The list of charges April – July 1929  

A total of 54 counts: some of the accused were jointly charged:

Giving six false alarms of fire on May 30 and 31

Wilfully setting fire to:

Kennerley’s storehouse in Power House Lane on June 22

packing cases at Smith and Smith, Ltd., in Albert Street, May 31

premises of Marks, Morrin and Jones, Ltd., Nelson Street, June 1

a dwelling at 76, Grey Street, on June 5.

a building at 5, Rutland Street, occupied by Moir and F. S. Sullivan, also on July 3

a building at 33, Lorne Street on the same date

two Auckland City Council sheds, in Sturdee Street, on June 28

the Normal School on July 3

a shop on the same date

John G. Nook’s shop in Avondale, on the same date

premises of Harrison and Gash, Ltd at Newmarket, June 3.

Stealing a revolver on June 29

Stealing a bicycle valued at £6 on June 11.

Stealing a bicycle valued at £3 on April 1.

Breaking and entering the counting-house of George Kennerley on June 22

Breaking and entering the counting-house of T. C. Grant on July 3 and theft

Breaking and entering Amos Firth’s shop in Avondale, on June 29

 

 

RCC 13/11/18 updated May 2020

 

Sources:

Papers Past

“United to Protect” by G.M.Gillon, Orion Press, 1985

Archway – Archives New Zealand

Auckland Cemeteries data – Auckland Council

Charles Alexander Woolley was from a “fire brigade family” and began his career as a talented fireman in Auckland but who swapped his fire uniform  and went to fight in World War One. He returned to rejoin the fire service and eventually become Superintendent at one of the country’s biggest brigades. His story was first told in 2014, one in a series to remember fire fighters who served – part of nation-wide celebrations to mark 100 years since the start of World War One and the Gallipoli Campaign.

 

The son of Charles and Edith Woolley, he was born in 1894 in Adelaide where his father was a senior officer in the fire brigade having received his training while with the London Fire Brigade.

In late 1901 Charles Snr was appointed Superintendent of Auckland Fire Brigade and the family migrated to New Zealand. Charles Snr oversaw many progressive moves within the Brigade, notably the transformation from horse-drawn hose reels to motorised appliances. He resigned in March 1918 due to illness and died in September that year.

Charles Jnr joined Auckland Fire Brigade as a boy-messenger aged 13, he served 2 years as a cadet and was then appointed fireman. Before his 18th birthday he had received his motor-driving diploma and by the age of 20 he was a senior foreman in the brigade. His brother, John (Jack), involved the family name in fire brigades: he was a member of both Remuera and Auckland City Fire Brigades.

Charles was just 21, and already had a remarkable rise through the ranks of the fire service, when he cut short his career to sign up for active service in World War One.

Charles Alexander Woolley, registered number 23/962, signed up with the Army in May 1915 and sailed with the 1st Battalion, New Zealand Rifle Brigade, for overseas aboard “Maunganui“  on October 9th, 1915.

From Fires to Arms

Woolley arrived in Egypt in mid-November and transferred by train to Aerodrome Camp near Cairo. It was a 5 week stopover before the Battalion was sent off to Alexandria en route to its first engagement with the enemy at Matruh on Christmas Day 1915. Subsequent events over 3 months proved the turning-point in the campaign that ultimately brought about the downfall of the Muslim group Senussi. Fighting took place in adverse weather and during periods without proper rations, the enemy pursued across sandy, rocky and undulating hostile territory.

In January 1917 he was among those wounded in action. After treatment and convalescence in England he was appointed to a machine-gun corps at Grantham, Lincolnshire, and promoted to Temporary Staff Sergeant-Instructor. This machine-gun branch was the nucleus of developing tanks for action in France – it later became the Tank Corps, then the Tank Regiment. Woolley was involved in these moves at Grantham and in March 1918 he was transferred to the Regiment’s depot in Camiers, France, about the time tank warfare was being reinvigorated with the arrival at the front of the new Mark V models.

Battle of Amiens

This enabled battalions of the Tank Regiment to re-equip and join preparations for the Battle of Amiens. It was to be one of the first major battles involving armoured warfare. For three days in August allies took the offensive and made a meaningful breakthrough, later regarded as “the beginning of the end of the war”. Exhausted Germans who survived the onslaught either capitulated or took to their heels. On the first day the allies, supported by the telling armoured units, advanced more than 11 kilometres (7 miles), one of the greatest advances recorded in the war. On subsequent days the allies gained further territory with many thousands of Germans taken prisoner.

British Mark V tank in action, France 1918.
Imperial War Museum London

The British war correspondent Phillip Gibbs said the Amiens’ effect was that “the enemy…is on the defensive” and, “the initiative of attack is so completely in our hands that we are able to strike him at many different places.”

Reinforcements, more tanks and additional armoured cars were sent from England in preparation for an all-out battle in 1919 – but the Armistice intervened.

Woolley played his part  in these actions in France and was given a commission about the time the armistice was signed.

While overseas he took time out wherever he was on leave to inspect fire brigades in Germany, Britain and France, amassing expert knowledge.

Returned Serviceman

After serving with the Army of Occupation in Germany, C. A. Woolley returned to New Zealand in 1916… he had been away for just in 4 years… and resumed employment with the Auckland City Fire Brigade. Woolley also resumed playing football on his return and was in the Auckland Representative Rugby team in 1919.

Auckland Rugby Team, 1919
Charles Woolley is at the right-hand end of the second to back row
Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 382-A12872

He then changed to Rugby League and toured Australia with the New Zealand team in 1921. The same year he had the distinction of playing in a combined Australian and New Zealand team against an Australian side at Sydney. He later reverted to Union.

Charles Woolley married Esther Pulman in July 1923 and about the same time was promoted to Inspecting Officer in the Auckland Fire Brigade and, a year later, to Third Officer.

Superintendent Charles Woolley, Mt Roskill Fire Brigade. Gordon Drummond Collection

In 1927 he went to live in Mt Roskill, a burgeoning suburb on Auckland’s South Eastern fringe, where a fire brigade was being established. Woolley was appointed superintendent. He oversaw the design and construction of the two-storeyed station in Mt Albert Road.

Mt Roskill Fire Station, 1928
Auckland Libraries Heritage Collection

The brigade purchased a brand new 1927 Dennis fire engine imported from England at a cost of £1000. It was just the very latest with a 20 horse power engine capable of making 35 miles per hour (56kph). According to the Auckland Star… “it has a first-aid hose reel and a tank holding 30 gallons (110 litres) of water. The pump can send up 250 gallons (950 litres) of water a minute through 1,900 feet (580 m) of hose. The chemical fire extinguisher, salvaging gear, and smoke respirators complete the firemen’s outfit”.

Mt Roskill’s 1927 Dennis fire engine
Gordon Drummond Collection

Charles Woolley recruited 18 volunteer auxiliaries comprising the Mt Roskill Brigade which soon moved into the new station on Mt Albert Road.

New Suburb

He took to remedying the poor water reticulation throughout most parts of the borough with publicity in local newspapers saying the pressure wasn’t sufficient for fire-fighting. “Should a fire occur in these areas,” he told the Press, “there’s only the remotest chance of the property being saved.  I want the Road Board to give due consideration to these recommendations to improve reticulation… the position is serious and must be taken in hand and not shelved for future years”.

He then found big gaps in fire protection and egress at the Ranfurly Home, which housed dozens of aging and recuperating returned soldiers – “…this rambling two storeyed wooden building also needs better water supply for fire-fighting”.

Notwithstanding the handicaps, the brigade was credited with several good saves. One, according to The Auckland Star, was when firemen tackled a fire in a 6-roomed house at the corner of Budock and Hillsborough Roads, confining fire-spread to the washhouse.

Woolley championed public telephone boxes in new subdivisions, so that residents could easily call in fire alarms. He had to contend with imminent proposals to amalgamate separate Fire Boards across Auckland into one cohesive fire district which he could foresee was probably the end of valuable assistance afforded by volunteers.

 

Wellington

But before talks among the discursive parties could be resolved Woolley, in May 1932, was celebrating his 38th birthday, the very day he received word that his application was successful for the position of Superintendent of Wellington City Fire Brigade.

Superintendent Charles Woolley, Wellington
National Library of New Zealand

His first challenge in the Capital was from a newspaper correspondent who wanted to know why abundant sea-water is not favoured for fire-fighting. Woolley explained that fresh is best: salt water can play havoc with the internal parts of fire-pumps. But there were plans for each suburb showing how and where to draught salt water supplies in the event of a major fire.  Harbour tugs, temporary street dams and large diameter hoses featured in the plans which, he said “have been carefully worked out by the brigade’s officers, and tests indicate a very fair degree of protection could be given, though nothing is certain when emergency conditions have to be met”.

A few years later he told a meeting of Insurance Brokers that the Brigade acknowledged the speed required in answering all fire alarms, “…and I hope others do, too. We have developed the ‘flying turnout,’ concentrating on light, fast, quickly accelerating motor units and we have negotiated with traffic departments for rights-of-way, we have placed warning sirens in congested areas, and we also press for the best street alarms. We have done our best to organise the brigade to meet all eventualities but we have to operate under a number of disadvantages, some incurable. The physical characteristics of the city, with the hills rising sheer from a narrow strip of flat land, make fire-fighting anything but easy. So far as planning is concerned, the city appears to have, like Topsy, just “growed”, and we have narrow, twisting streets, with sharp corners and hillside roads that seem to have followed goat tracks. Other disadvantages can, I hope, soon be overcome, like the present central station, which is not even large enough to house the apparatus required, not to mention the staff”.

A Makeover

Woolley oversaw the planning and erection of the new central fire station which opened with all due ceremony in Oriental Parade in December 1937.

Wellington Central Fire Station
Alexander Turnbull Library

He also modernised much of the equipment, bettered firemen’s work conditions and planned for replacement of several aging suburban stations plus the construction of new ones to meet Wellington’s growth.  He introduced a new specialist vehicle, the Salvage Tender, and updated old appliances. Unbeknown to him at the time, this stood the city in good stead for  new risks over the bleak war years.

Second World War

Woolley headed the Brigade throughout the conflict, punctuated with drawn out argument and controversy when Emergency Precaution System and Fire Protection Services were established in tandem with Civil Defence, the Home Guard and existing fire services.

Armband worn by members of the Emergency Precaution Service.
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa

Woolley, like others, had to ask who was in charge at fires, who was responsible, who was providing training and the uniforms and how did the new organisations dovetail with existing brigades? After months of uncertainty the Government moved to appoint District Fire Controllers (Woolley was chosen for Wellington) under the Emergency Fire Service constituted in 1941. This was designed to ensure existing (augmented) fire services operated in parallel with, but subordinate to, Civil Defence measures. This scheme was stepped up after the raids on Pearl Harbour on December 7th 1941 when Japan’s participation in the war increased the perceived risk of invasion.

Woolley also strengthened the ranks of Wellington Fire Police as an adjunct to firefighting and salvage during the war years, ensuring they were looked after with uniform, equipment and an additional petrol allowance during rationing so they could get to fires and to training in their private cars.

Changes

Wellington Fire Police at a training session
“From Bells to Blazes”

Post- war Woolley pushed development of the fire brigade as quickly and as hard as post-war austerity and restrictions allowed. It was a quiet time. There was some suggestion of revised fire legislation to overhaul and update fire protection services in New Zealand… and this became urgent after a disastrous fire. A formal Inquiry had investigated matters surrounding the blaze in Ballantyne’s Department Store, Christchurch on 18th November 1947 in which 41 people died. The Inquiry found many shortcomings and made a host of recommendations to improve fire services and building regulations. Some changes required legislation.

Subsequently C. A. Woolley was still superintendent in Wellington when, for the first time in New Zealand, an over-arching body was created, the Fire Service Council, which had oversight of all fire brigades. Fire Boards had now to confer with the Council on certain acquisitions and procedures to promote nation-wide standards and a Dominion Chief Fire Services Officer was appointed to further reform fire brigades throughout the country.

When considering a new fire engine for Wellington in 1953 Charles Woolley recalled the reliability and power of Mt Roskill’s old Dennis appliance and those he had since encountered.  He set something of a new standard when he ordered the Brigade’s first Dennis in the “F” series, a powerful F12, the largest model in the series known as the “limousine fully-enclosed appliance”, reputedly “the best yet made by Dennis Brothers of Guilford in England”.

Wellington Fire Brigade’s F12 appliance
111 Emergency

Worldwide, these fire engines were found to be ideal for urban fire brigades: Woolley’s lead was followed for the next 20 years as Wellington Fire Brigade added first, a Dennis turntable ladder and then other Dennis appliances to enhance and modernise the fleet. Wellington held out, insisting on Dennis replacements, long after the Fire Service Council began steering fire brigades to buy appliances made locally.

Retirement

Charles Alexander Woolley retired as Chief Fire Officer of the Wellington Fire Brigade in 1954 after 22 years in command.

In the Queen’s Birthday Honours that year it was announced he had been made a Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (MBE).

He died on November the first 1966, aged 72.

 

We are remembering them.

 

Sources

Papers Past, National Library of New Zealand

Archway New Zealand archives

Gordon Drummond Collection

“Bells to Blazes – The Story of the Wellington Fire Brigade 1865 -1985” edited by Rex Monigatti

 

RCC 2014 / 2020